![]() It has a password manager that securely stashes away your login credentials for various apps and websites. Additional Featuresīeyond just churning out login codes, Microsoft Authenticator offers some other handy capabilities. Google Authenticator, on the other hand, sticks exclusively to the 30-second time-based or counter-based codes. And if your device supports it, you can use biometrics like fingerprints or face recognition to autofill generated codes. You've got your standard time-based codes that change every 30 seconds, but you can also use push notifications to approve sign-in requests, which pops up a notification right on your phone to tap. Microsoft Authenticator offers you different ways to authenticate. We will delve into the nitty-gritty details of each app, but before that, here is a comparison table of key features between Microsoft Authenticator ( Android | iOS) and Google Authenticator ( Android | iOS). Microsoft Authenticator vs Google Authenticator: A Quick Comparison ![]() ![]() They serve the same core purpose, but some key differences are worth considering before deciding which to use. Microsoft and Google offer free authenticator apps that generate time-based one-time passwords for two-factor authentication (2FA) logins. Microsoft Authenticator requires a Microsoft account sign-in and offers autofill capabilities, while Google Authenticator requires a Google account sign-in and does not have autofill capabilities.Microsoft Authenticator provides additional features like password management, payment card storage, address management, and Verified IDs, while Google Authenticator focuses solely on generating authentication codes.Microsoft Authenticator offers more authentication methods, including time-based codes, push notifications, and biometrics, while Google Authenticator only offers time-based or counter-based codes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |